Promising
Sulforaphane
The prediction game
Call it: rising or fading?
Where does Sulforaphane stand 12 months from now? Lock your call with a confidence level. When the window closes, the Brier rule scores your calibration: right and confident earns the most, wrong and confident costs the most. Points and a leaderboard spot are the whole prize. No stakes, no money.
One call per intervention. It locks the moment you submit: no edits, no cancels. It resolves when the 12-month window closes.
The Crowd’s Call
Rising or fading over the next 12 months? Lock your call and find out if you saw it coming.
Community Signal
No weigh-ins yet. Be the first and set the early signal.
Evidence
Evidence grade: C (mixed evidence)
Graded from the strength of the published research, independent of any verdict on this page.
Evidence Anchor
BioHarmony 6.8/10
The practical verdict on sulforaphane is that it is a reasonable food-level intervention for cruciferous vegetable enthusiasts and a selective supplement for metabolic-health and pollutant-detoxification use cases. It is not the broad-spectrum NRF2 panacea the marketing suggests. The score lands at 6.8 / 10 (Neutral) because the Egner 2014 Qidong detox signal and the Axelsson 2017 glycemic signal are real but several broad disease trials in COPD, pneumonia, prediabetes, prostate cancer, and breast cancer have been mixed or negative. Sulforaphane scores below most well-established metabolic interventions and most NRF2-adjacent tools that have made it to clinical translation. It is meaningfully different from a snake-oil supplement in that the core mechanism is real and reproducible; what holds it back is the gap between what the molecule does in cells and what it has been shown to do in adequately powered human disease trials. ✅ Best for: People with elevated air pollution exposure or dysregulated fasting glucose who can source a glucoraphanin product paired with active myrosinase (Mastaloudis 2026) and will track fasting glucose or hs-CRP for 8 to 12 weeks; obese type 2 diabetes patients in the dysregulated subgroup who have read Axelsson 2017 and accept the small effect size; cruciferous vegetable enthusiasts who want a food-first NRF2 activator and are willing to grow broccoli sprouts at home for cents per dose; users with intact GSTM1 or GSTT1 genotype and a documented gut microbiome conversion capacity who want to test responder status; readers willing to base a supplement trial on objective markers (fasting glucose, HbA1c, hs-CRP, ALT and AST) rather than subjective detox claims. ❌ Avoid if: You are pregnant, breastfeeding, or planning conception with concentrated extracts (food-level cruciferous intake is fine); you are in active chemotherapy, radiation, or hormone-sensitive cancer treatment without oncology approval; you have a history of severe GI sensitivity to brassicas or sulfur compounds; you are on warfarin or other anticoagulants without clinician review; you have severe thyroid disease combined with iodine deficiency and very high raw cruciferous intake; you are buying a glucoraphanin only product without active myrosinase and not relying on gut microbial conversion (exposure will be variable and low); you are looking for a broad-spectrum NRF2 cure-all rather than a selective intervention with subgroup-dependent effects; you are spending opportunity-cost dollars or attention here that would generate larger returns from sleep, training, GLP-1 agonists, smoking cessation, or basic dietary improvements.
Read the full BioHarmony report
My score and my verdict: one signal of three, never the whole answer.
Momentum
Signals begin with Edition 2
Direction needs two weekly snapshots to compare, so the arrows stay off until the next edition. Attention tracking is already running.
In the news this week: Ben Greenfield Life.
Momentum = how fast attention is rising across search, Reddit, PubMed, podcasts, and curated industry newsletters this week; it can flag an item as Overhyped/Fading, but it never overrides the evidence behind Proven. How momentum works.
- Ring
- Promising
- Trend
- Begins with Edition 2
- Momentum
- 5.3%
- BioHarmony Score
- 6.8/10
- Last Updated
- Jul 2, 2026
Sources
- BioHarmony score
- Search trend delta
- Reddit velocity
- PubMed publication count
- Podcast mention frequency
- Curated newsletter mentions
The score anchors the ring; the other five drive momentum, which can nudge the ring by one step at most. How placement works.
Weigh In
Your input feeds the community signal shown beside my verdict. It informs the board and it never sets the score by itself. How community input works.
New voice here? We send a one-tap verification link so every entry comes from a real person. Signed-in members skip this.