Skip to content
← Index board

Health Optimization Index

Glutathione (GSH)

Nick’s assessment
Promising
Research evidence
D, early evidence
Attention
7.1 / 100▼ Falling this week
6.2/ 10

BioHarmony score

Glutathione is the body's master antioxidant, a cysteine-bearing tripeptide that powers detoxification and redox balance. Oral supplements are bioavailability-limited: a single dose barely raises blood levels, though Richie 2015 found 6 months of 1,000 mg/day raised body stores 30 to 35 percent. Real human outcomes stay modest and route-dependent.

Read the full report Benefits, risks and practical guidance.

Read Nick’s assessment Why it earned this rating

Glutathione is a 6.0–6.5/10, worth trying for the right person and easy to overrate for everyone else. The practical verdict is to treat it as a targeted, tracked experiment rather than a blanket wellness staple. The people most likely to benefit are those with measured glutathione depletion, fatty liver, or a high oxidative-stress burden who will pick an absorbable route and watch a specific marker. The people most likely to waste money are healthy users swallowing plain capsules expecting dramatic effects, and anyone chasing skin whitening, where the evidence is weak and the injectable route is dangerous. The score tier is justified by a foundational mechanism and excellent safety pulling up against modest, mixed clinical outcomes and a cheaper precursor alternative pulling down.

✅ Best for: Adults with documented glutathione depletion or high oxidative-stress burden who will track a redox or inflammatory marker; people with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease willing to monitor ALT over 3 to 4 months, the population with the clearest signal in Honda 2017; older adults exploring the aging-redox angle who understand the strongest data is for the GlyNAC precursor; experimenters willing to use a sublingual or liposomal form rather than plain capsules to overcome poor absorption; anyone who would otherwise reach for an unproven antioxidant and prefers a benign, well-understood molecule with a clean stop.

❌ Avoid if: You expect a dramatic acute effect, because oral glutathione works slowly and subtly; you are pursuing skin lightening, where the oral evidence missed significance and the injectable route is unapproved and linked to Stevens-Johnson syndrome and contamination; you would source injectable glutathione from a non-medical or skin-whitening clinic, the one genuinely risky path; you want the most cost-effective way to raise glutathione, in which case N-acetylcysteine is the better-evidenced and cheaper precursor; or you are already well-nourished and antioxidant-replete and would notice nothing.

Share your experience

Your answers are optional and help other readers — they never change my score. How community input works.

Tried it in real life?

How would you assess it?

Favorable is the strongest rating, followed by Promising, then Experimental. Overhyped means the claims outrun the evidence or interest is fading.

Make a 12-month prediction Will it rise or fall in the Index?

Choose a direction and your confidence. Correct predictions earn leaderboard points.

Your 12-month call on Glutathione (GSH)
How sure are you?

Your prediction is final once submitted. We’ll check it in 12 months. See the leaderboard →

Updated Sep 18, 2026 How the Index ranks →

Educational information, not medical advice. Ask a qualified clinician about risks and interactions. Independent ratings: no affiliate links, sponsored placements or paid rankings.