Experimental
CJC-1295
The prediction game
Call it: rising or fading?
Where does CJC-1295 stand 12 months from now? Lock your call with a confidence level. When the window closes, the Brier rule scores your calibration: right and confident earns the most, wrong and confident costs the most. Points and a leaderboard spot are the whole prize. No stakes, no money.
One call per intervention. It locks the moment you submit: no edits, no cancels. It resolves when the 12-month window closes.
The Crowd’s Call
Rising or fading over the next 12 months? Lock your call and find out if you saw it coming.
Community Signal
No weigh-ins yet. Be the first and set the early signal.
Evidence
Evidence grade: D (early evidence)
Graded from the strength of the published research, independent of any verdict on this page.
Evidence Anchor
BioHarmony 5.5/10
CJC-1295 is a 5.5 / 10 fit for people weighing body composition, sleep quality, and recovery and repair, especially when the goal is a tracked experiment with clear endpoints. The strongest evidence anchor is [Therapeutic 2026](https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/27/9/3890): Screened in audit and excluded from efficacy upgrade because it is not CJC-1295-specific and not a systematic review/meta-analysis or n>=100 RCT. [Teichman 2006](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16352683/) adds a second signal, but CJC-1295 still has gaps around large trials, long-term outcomes, responder profiles, or real-world adherence. That makes CJC-1295 useful for a defined reader, while weaker for broad anti-aging or catch-all wellness claims. In practice, CJC-1295 belongs after basics, diagnosis when relevant, and a stop rule based on symptoms, labs, sleep, or performance. ✅ Best for: Healthy adults 30-50 who have already optimized sleep, training, protein intake, body composition basics, and alcohol reduction, but still want to experiment with GH-axis support for recovery, body composition, or sleep depth. The most defensible format is no-DAC Mod-GRF 1-29 plus ipamorelin, with baseline IGF-1, fasting glucose/A1c, lipids, blood pressure, and repeat labs every 8-12 weeks. It is also best for people who understand that Teichman 2006 proves hormone response, not the physique outcomes commonly marketed online, and who would choose regulated tesamorelin when a legitimate medical indication exists. ❌ Avoid if: You have active cancer, previous cancer, strong first-degree family cancer history, active cardiovascular disease, arrhythmia, uncontrolled hypertension, diabetes, pre-diabetes, pituitary disease, pregnancy or pregnancy planning, pediatric use, or no access to labs and clinician oversight. Avoid the DAC variant if your main concern is sustained IGF-1 exposure. Tested athletes should avoid CJC-1295 because WADA prohibits growth hormone-releasing hormone analogues at all times. Also avoid if you are trying to compensate for poor sleep, undertraining, overtraining, low protein, or unmanaged metabolic health with injections. Sourcing & dosing caveat: gray-market supply; score assumes clean, correctly-dosed material.
Read the full BioHarmony report
My score and my verdict: one signal of three, never the whole answer.
Momentum
Signals begin with Edition 2
Direction needs two weekly snapshots to compare, so the arrows stay off until the next edition. Attention tracking is already running.
In the news this week: Jay Campbell.
Momentum = how fast attention is rising across search, Reddit, PubMed, podcasts, and curated industry newsletters this week; it can flag an item as Overhyped/Fading, but it never overrides the evidence behind Proven. How momentum works.
- Ring
- Experimental
- Trend
- Begins with Edition 2
- Momentum
- 6.7%
- BioHarmony Score
- 5.5/10
- Last Updated
- Jul 2, 2026
Sources
- BioHarmony score
- Search trend delta
- Reddit velocity
- PubMed publication count
- Podcast mention frequency
- Curated newsletter mentions
The score anchors the ring; the other five drive momentum, which can nudge the ring by one step at most. How placement works.
Weigh In
Your input feeds the community signal shown beside my verdict. It informs the board and it never sets the score by itself. How community input works.
New voice here? We send a one-tap verification link so every entry comes from a real person. Signed-in members skip this.