Experimental
5-Amino-1MQ
The prediction game
Call it: rising or fading?
Where does 5-Amino-1MQ stand 12 months from now? Lock your call with a confidence level. When the window closes, the Brier rule scores your calibration: right and confident earns the most, wrong and confident costs the most. Points and a leaderboard spot are the whole prize. No stakes, no money.
One call per intervention. It locks the moment you submit: no edits, no cancels. It resolves when the 12-month window closes.
The Crowd’s Call
Early scout calls are locked in
Community Signal
No weigh-ins yet. Be the first and set the early signal.
Evidence
Evidence grade: E (thin evidence)
Graded from the strength of the published research, independent of any verdict on this page.
Evidence Anchor
BioHarmony 4.9/10
5-Amino-1MQ earns a Caution score because the mechanism and animal data are promising while the human evidence is absent and the supply chain is unregulated. It is reasonable to consider only if you are a lean health optimizer on a calorie deficit, you dose it orally at 50 to 150 mg, you source it carefully, and you treat it as an experiment you track rather than a proven tool. It is the wrong choice for anyone who wants evidence-backed results, competes in tested sport, or expects fat loss without diet. For most people, proven fundamentals like a real calorie deficit, resistance training, and sleep will move body composition further than this compound, which belongs in the experimental tier of a stack rather than the foundation. The score could rise quickly with a single clean human trial, or fall if genotoxicity is confirmed. ✅ Best for: Lean users on a calorie deficit who want a possible edge on fat oxidation and training energy and accept preclinical-grade certainty. People who specifically want the oral route and the felt energy effect, like Nick, who runs 50 to 100 mg as a pre-workout. Experienced self-experimenters who track their own biomarkers and subjective response. Stack-minded users pairing it with NAD+ precursors, where the mechanisms align. Anyone who can source a tested, accurately dosed product and is comfortable cycling it. ❌ Avoid if: You are pregnant, breastfeeding, or have an active or prior cancer, because there is no safety data for these groups. You compete in any tested sport, since 5-Amino-1MQ is WADA-banned under category S0. You have liver disease or are highly sensitive to stimulation or prone to insomnia. You want results backed by human trials, since none exist. You can only source it from consumer marketplaces like Amazon or eBay, where counterfeit and under-dosed product is a documented risk. You expect it to replace a calorie deficit for fat loss.
Read the full BioHarmony report
My score and my verdict: one signal of three, never the whole answer.
Momentum
Signals begin with Edition 2
Direction needs two weekly snapshots to compare, so the arrows stay off until the next edition. Attention tracking is already running.
In the news this week: Jay Campbell.
Momentum = how fast attention is rising across search, Reddit, PubMed, podcasts, and curated industry newsletters this week; it can flag an item as Overhyped/Fading, but it never overrides the evidence behind Proven. How momentum works.
- Ring
- Experimental
- Trend
- Begins with Edition 2
- Momentum
- 33.3%
- BioHarmony Score
- 4.9/10
- Last Updated
- Jul 2, 2026
Sources
- BioHarmony score
- Search trend delta
- Reddit velocity
- PubMed publication count
- Podcast mention frequency
- Curated newsletter mentions
The score anchors the ring; the other five drive momentum, which can nudge the ring by one step at most. How placement works.
Weigh In
Your input feeds the community signal shown beside my verdict. It informs the board and it never sets the score by itself. How community input works.
New voice here? We send a one-tap verification link so every entry comes from a real person. Signed-in members skip this.