Rapamycin

Rapamycin (sirolimus) is an mTORC1 inhibitor with the most robust pharmacological lifespan extension ever observed in mammals (9-26% median extension in the NIA ITP across three independent sites). Intermittent weekly longevity dosing (3-8 mg) differs from continuous transplant-level immunosuppression. Zero completed human longevity RCTs; Mannick 2018 n=264 showed 30.6% reduction in respiratory infections persisting 12 months post-treatment.

Rapamycin scored 6.5 / 10 (๐Ÿ‘ Worth trying) on the BioHarmony scale as a Substance โ†’ Pharmaceutical / Drug.

Overall6.5 / 10๐Ÿ‘ Worth tryingGood for the right person
Your Score๐Ÿ”’Take the quiz โ†’
Autophagy 8.5 Longevity / Lifespan 8.0 Cellular Senescence 7.8 Healthspan 7.5 Immune Function 7.0
๐Ÿ“… Scored April 2026ยทBioHarmony v0.4

What It Is

Type: Pharmaceutical (mTOR inhibitor; prescription / compounded).

Rapamycin (sirolimus) is a macrolide compound originally isolated from a soil bacterium (Streptomyces hygroscopicus) on Easter Island in the 1970s. It was FDA-approved in 1999 as Rapamune for organ transplant immunosuppression. The molecule inhibits mTORC1 (mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Complex 1), a central nutrient-sensing and growth-regulating kinase complex that integrates signals from amino acids, insulin, and growth factors. At transplant doses (typically 2 to 5 mg daily), continuous exposure disrupts both mTORC1 and mTORC2 over time, producing the immunosuppressive and metabolic side effects (insulin resistance, dyslipidemia, wound healing impairment) that defined the drug's early clinical use.

The longevity biohacker community uses rapamycin at substantially lower intermittent doses (3 to 8 mg once weekly), which selectively inhibits mTORC1 while sparing mTORC2, per Lamming 2012. This selectivity matters enormously: mTORC1 inhibition promotes autophagy (cellular self-eating and quality control), suppresses the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) that drives chronic inflammation in aging, and produces the pharmacological lifespan extension observed in mice. mTORC2 inhibition produces the metabolic side effects. The weekly dosing rhythm, empirically derived from community experience and increasingly validated by mechanistic research, aims to capture mTORC1 benefits while avoiding mTORC2 disruption.

The preclinical evidence is the strongest for any pharmacological longevity intervention. The NIA Interventions Testing Program (a gold-standard multi-site replicated mouse study) demonstrated 9 to 26 percent median lifespan extension across three independent sites, dose-dependent and female-biased. Bitto 2016 showed that 90 days of transient rapamycin treatment produced lifespan extension comparable to lifelong dosing, suggesting a "hit and run" pharmacology unusual among longevity interventions. Juricic 2022 demonstrated that brief rapamycin exposure in early adulthood produces persistent increases in intestinal autophagy decades later, strengthening the durable-benefits mechanism.

Human evidence is limited to immune biomarker and surrogate endpoints. Mannick 2014 showed ~20 percent improvement in flu vaccine response in elderly subjects on everolimus (a rapamycin analog). Mannick 2018 n=264 showed 30.6 percent reduction in respiratory infections persisting 12 months after just 6 weeks of treatment, which is a remarkable durability signal. The Dog Aging Project TRIAD Phase 1 showed improved cardiac function in 24 dogs. The AgelessRx PEARL trial (48 weeks, ~150 subjects) showed preliminary visceral fat reduction. None of these are lifespan endpoints. No human longevity RCT exists or is feasible on typical trial timelines.

Current status: Nick has not tried rapamycin. Monitoring the Dog Aging TRIAD and AgelessRx PEARL readouts.

Terminology

  • mTOR: mechanistic Target of Rapamycin. Central cellular nutrient-sensing kinase.
  • mTORC1 / mTORC2: The two multi-protein complexes containing mTOR with distinct functions.
  • SASP: Senescence-Associated Secretory Phenotype. Inflammatory signals from senescent cells.
  • ITP: NIA Interventions Testing Program. Multi-site replicated mouse longevity research platform.
  • TRIAD: Test of Rapamycin in Aging Dogs (Dog Aging Project).
  • PEARL: Periodic Evaluation of Aging with Rapamycin for Longevity (AgelessRx trial).
  • NIA: National Institute on Aging.
  • FDA: U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
  • CYP3A4 / CYP3A5: Liver cytochrome P450 enzymes metabolizing rapamycin.
  • LDL: Low-Density Lipoprotein cholesterol.
  • CBC: Complete Blood Count.
  • Trough level: Lowest blood concentration between doses; clinical monitoring target.
  • Aphthous stomatitis: Mouth ulcers; most common rapamycin side effect.
  • Hit-and-run pharmacology: Transient drug exposure producing durable biological changes.
  • BCAA: Branched-Chain Amino Acids (leucine, isoleucine, valine). Activate mTORC1.

Dosing & Protocols

Dosing information is summarized from published research and community reports. This is not a prescribing guide. Consult a healthcare provider before starting any protocol.

View 1 route and 6 protocols

Routes & Forms

RouteFormClinical RangeCommunity Range
oralTablet (sirolimus brand or compounded) Transplant: 2-5 mg/day; Longevity: N/A (off-label) 3-8 mg once weekly (longevity tier)

Protocols

Community longevity starter Anecdotal

Dose
3 mg
Frequency
Once weekly
Duration
Indefinite with quarterly monitoring

Titrate up if tolerated and blood level suboptimal

Community longevity standard Anecdotal

Dose
6 mg
Frequency
Once weekly
Duration
Indefinite

Peter Attia-style protocol; target trough 5-15 ng/mL

Advanced intermittent Anecdotal

Dose
8 mg
Frequency
Once weekly
Duration
Indefinite

Upper end of community tier; requires blood level verification

Cyclical (Attia variant) Anecdotal

Dose
6 mg weekly x 12 weeks, then 4-week break
Frequency
Cycled
Duration
Indefinite cycling

Minimizes chronic exposure while preserving benefits per Bitto 2016 hit-and-run mechanism

Pre-surgery hold Clinical

Frequency
1-2 weeks before to 1-2 weeks after surgery
Duration
Peri-operative

Wound healing impairment with active drug; not negotiable

Transplant (reference only) Clinical

Dose
2-5 mg daily
Frequency
Daily
Duration
Indefinite

NOT longevity dosing; chronic daily exposure disrupts mTORC2 and produces metabolic side effects

How the score is calculated
Upside (weighted)
+2.15
Downside (harm ร—1.4)
1.34
EV = 2.15 โˆ’ 1.34 = 0.81 โ†’ Score = ((0.81 + 7) / 12) ร— 10 = 6.5 / 10

Upside (2.15 / 5.00)

DimensionWeightScoreVisualWeighted
Efficacy25%3.2
0.800
Breadth of Benefits15%3.8
0.570
Evidence Quality25%2.8
0.700
Speed of Onset10%2.2
0.220
Durability10%3.8
0.380
Bioindividuality Upside15%3.2
0.480
Total3.150

Upside Rationale

Efficacy (3.2/5.0): The ITP mouse data is the strongest pharmacological lifespan result in mammals: 9-26% median lifespan extension across three independent sites, dose-dependent, with females showing greater benefit. However, zero completed human trials have used lifespan or healthspan as a primary endpoint. Mannick 2014 (n=218) showed ~20% improvement in flu vaccine response in elderly subjects on everolimus (a rapamycin analog). Mannick 2018 (n=264) showed a 30.6% reduction in respiratory infections (p=0.008), with effects persisting 12 months after just 6 weeks of treatment. These are promising surrogate endpoints, not direct longevity evidence. The Dog Aging Project TRIAD Phase 1 showed improved cardiac function in 24 dogs. AgelessRx PEARL (48 weeks, ~150 subjects) showed preliminary signals toward reduced visceral fat. Scored at 3.2 rather than higher because human efficacy for actual longevity remains unproven.

Breadth of Benefits (3.8/5.0): Rapamycin's mechanism touches multiple systems. mTORC1 inhibition promotes autophagy (cellular cleanup), suppresses SASP (reducing chronic inflammation), improves immune function in aged subjects, shows cardiac benefits in preclinical models, reduces cancer incidence in animal studies, and may improve skin aging. This is genuinely systemic, spanning immune, cardiovascular, metabolic, and cellular maintenance pathways. Scored below 4.0 because most of these benefits are demonstrated only in animal models or small human trials.

Evidence Quality (2.8/5.0): Base score: 3.5. The ITP data is multi-site, independently replicated preclinical evidence (the gold standard for animal studies). Multiple small human RCTs exist (Mannick 2014, 2018; Kraig 2018; PEARL). However, total longevity-relevant human RCT subjects number only ~700. Applied -1.0 integrity adjustment: the Mannick studies were funded by Novartis, and no independent group has replicated the immune rejuvenation findings. Applied +0.3 for the ITP multi-site independent replication in mice. Net: 3.5 - 1.0 + 0.3 = 2.8.

Speed of Onset (2.2/5.0): Immune biomarker changes appear within 4-6 weeks (Mannick data). However, the longevity endpoints that matter most have no measurable timeline in humans. You cannot feel autophagy upregulation or SASP suppression. For the individual user, there is no clear feedback signal that it is working. The only near-term markers are immune function tests and blood work changes (lipids, glucose), which take weeks to months.

Durability (3.8/5.0): This is rapamycin's standout dimension. Mannick 2018 showed immune enhancement persisting 12 months after just a 6-week treatment course. Bitto 2016 demonstrated in mice that 90 days of transient rapamycin treatment produced durable lifespan extension comparable to lifelong dosing. This hit-and-run pharmacology, where brief exposure triggers lasting biological changes, is unusual and valuable. If confirmed in humans, it means periodic dosing courses rather than lifelong commitment.

Bioindividuality Upside (3.2/5.0): ITP data shows females benefit significantly more than males in mice (larger lifespan extension). Older individuals likely benefit more; the mTOR pathway becomes increasingly dysregulated with age, so the intervention addresses a problem that worsens over time. CYP3A5 polymorphisms significantly affect rapamycin metabolism, meaning some individuals will achieve target blood levels on standard doses while others over- or under-shoot. This requires blood level monitoring for proper dosing. The population that benefits most is likely older (50+) individuals with measurable age-related immune decline.

Downside (1.34 / 5.00)

DimensionWeightScoreVisualWeighted
Safety Risk30%2.8
0.840
Side Effect Profile15%2.5
0.375
Financial Cost5%2.5
0.125
Time/Effort Burden5%1.5
0.075
Opportunity Cost5%1.5
0.075
Dependency / Withdrawal15%1.2
0.180
Reversibility25%1.3
0.325
Total1.995
Harm subtotal ร— 1.42.408
Opportunity subtotal ร— 1.00.275
Combined downside2.683
Baseline offset (constant)−1.340
Effective downside penalty1.343

Downside Rationale

Safety Risk (2.8/5.0): Rapamycin carries a black box warning for immunosuppression, lymphoma risk, and infections at transplant doses (daily, high-dose). At longevity doses (3-8mg weekly, intermittent), the safety profile appears substantially different. Zero cases of pneumonitis have been reported at longevity doses, though pneumonitis is idiosyncratic and can be fatal at oncology doses (2-15% incidence). This does NOT trigger the catastrophic floor (4.0) because zero cases exist at longevity doses and the mechanism appears dose-dependent; weekly intermittent dosing selectively targets mTORC1 while sparing mTORC2 (Lamming 2012). However, the possibility cannot be fully excluded given the small N of healthy adults studied. Lipid elevation (15-30%) and potential insulin resistance from mTORC2 disruption at chronic doses are real metabolic concerns. Wound healing impairment requires holding the drug 1-2 weeks before and after surgery. CYP3A4 interactions are significant (ketoconazole, grapefruit, clarithromycin, rifampin). No long-term controlled safety data beyond ~12 months in healthy adults. Scored at 2.8: higher than most supplements due to genuine pharmacological risks, but well below the catastrophic floor.

Side Effect Profile (2.5/5.0): Mouth ulcers (aphthous stomatitis) are the most common side effect at longevity doses, reported in 5-15% of clinical trial participants and 20-40% of forum users. Lipid elevation (LDL, triglycerides) occurs in 15-30% and requires monitoring. Mild GI effects are reported. Fatigue on dose day is a common forum complaint. These are manageable but not trivial; they require ongoing attention and blood work monitoring.

Financial Cost (2.5/5.0): Compounding pharmacy rapamycin runs $50-100/month. Add periodic blood work (CBC, lipids, glucose, rapamycin trough levels): $50-100/quarter. Total: roughly $75-150/month including monitoring. Not cheap, not exorbitant. Requires a prescribing physician willing to write off-label, which adds friction.

Time/Effort Burden (1.5/5.0): One pill per week. Periodic blood draws (every 3-6 months once stable). The main time burden is finding and maintaining a relationship with a prescriber, and tracking blood work results. Minimal once established.

Opportunity Cost (1.5/5.0): Rapamycin does not meaningfully crowd out other longevity interventions. It can be combined with exercise, supplementation, and other protocols. The CYP3A4 interactions require awareness but do not eliminate major intervention categories. Minor score for the need to hold before surgery and the monitoring burden that consumes some health-optimization bandwidth.

Dependency/Withdrawal (1.2/5.0): No physical dependency. No withdrawal symptoms. No tolerance development (mTORC1 does not upregulate in response to intermittent inhibition). If anything, the Bitto 2016 data suggests transient exposure may produce lasting benefit, meaning dependency is the opposite of the concern. Stop anytime.

Reversibility (1.3/5.0): Weekly dosing washes out within 2-3 days (half-life ~62 hours). No permanent biological changes from intermittent low-dose use. Lipid and glucose changes normalize after cessation. Completely reversible. The 0.3 above minimum reflects the theoretical concern that any period of immune modulation could have consequences during an acute infection coinciding with peak drug levels.

Verdict

โœ… Best for: Adults 50+ with measurable age-related immune decline who are comfortable with off-label pharmaceutical use, have access to a longevity-oriented prescriber, and will commit to periodic blood work monitoring. Those with a strong interest in the mechanistic science of mTOR-driven aging who understand they are early adopters. Individuals who tolerate periodic mouth sores and can manage CYP3A4 interactions.

โŒ Avoid if: You are under 40 (mTOR dysregulation is less relevant, risk/benefit tips unfavorably). You have a history of interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis. You are immunocompromised or take immunosuppressants. You are unwilling to do regular blood work. You have upcoming surgery (must hold 1-2 weeks). You take CYP3A4 inhibitors (ketoconazole, clarithromycin) or strong inducers (rifampin) without physician guidance. You want evidence-backed certainty; rapamycin for longevity remains experimental.

Use Case Breakdown

The overall BioHarmony score reflects the intervention's primary evidence profile. These subratings are independent assessments per use case.

Use CaseScoreSummary
โœ… Autophagy8.5Direct mechanism: mTORC1 inhibition de-represses autophagy initiation; gold standard pharmacological autophagy activator
โœ… Longevity / Lifespan8.0Most robust pharmacological mammalian lifespan extension (ITP 9-26%); no human lifespan data yet
๐Ÿ’ช Cellular Senescence7.8mTORC1 inhibition suppresses SASP directly; senolytic-adjacent mechanism
๐Ÿ’ช Healthspan7.5Mannick 2018 immune enhancement, reduced infections; autophagy and SASP mechanisms broadly relevant
๐Ÿ’ช Immune Function7.0Mannick 2014/2018: immune rejuvenation in elderly, 30.6% reduced respiratory infections at 12 months
๐Ÿ‘ Anti-Inflammatory6.8SASP suppression reduces age-related chronic inflammation signal
๐Ÿ‘ Mitochondrial6.5Autophagy upregulation includes mitophagy; indirect mitochondrial quality control
๐Ÿ‘ Neuroprotection6.5Alzheimer mouse model rescue; Parkinson's protective preclinical; emerging human interest
๐Ÿ‘ Cardiovascular6.5TRIAD dog trial cardiac function; preclinical CVD protection
๐Ÿ‘ Skin / Beauty6.3Topical rapamycin small RCTs show skin aging improvement; systemic evidence thin
๐Ÿ‘ Cognition / Focus6.0Preclinical neuroprotection via autophagy; small human cognitive data mixed
๐Ÿ‘ Telomere / DNA Repair6.0Indirect via cellular stress reduction and senescence control
๐Ÿ‘ Memory5.8Age-related memory preservation in mouse models; human data thin
๐Ÿ‘ Body Composition / Fat Loss5.8PEARL preliminary visceral fat reduction; mechanism via autophagy
โš–๏ธ Recovery / Repair5.5Wound healing impairment (surgery caveat); otherwise neutral
โš–๏ธ Sleep Quality5.5No significant effect on sleep in community reports
โš–๏ธ Methylation Support5.5Epigenetic age reduction signal in preclinical; human data emerging
โš–๏ธ Blood Sugar / Glycemic Control5.0Chronic use can worsen insulin resistance via mTORC2 disruption; weekly dosing minimizes
โš–๏ธ Energy / Fatigue5.0Dose-day fatigue is common community complaint
โš–๏ธ Mood / Emotional Regulation5.0No direct mood RCTs; depression signal absent
โ—‹ Strength / Power4.5Potential mild interference with resistance training; dose day avoidance common
โ—‹ Muscle Growth / Hypertrophy3.5mTOR inhibition is counter to muscle protein synthesis; schedule around training

Frequently Asked Questions

Does rapamycin actually extend lifespan in humans?

No confirmed human lifespan extension data exists yet. The strongest evidence remains the NIA Interventions Testing Program showing 9 to 26 percent median lifespan extension in mice across three independent sites, dose-dependent and female-biased. Human data is limited to immune biomarker and surrogate endpoints: Mannick 2018 n=264 showed 30.6 percent reduction in respiratory infections persisting 12 months after just 6 weeks of treatment. Mannick 2014 showed ~20 percent improvement in flu vaccine response in elderly subjects on everolimus. The Dog Aging Project TRIAD Phase 1 showed cardiac function improvements in 24 dogs. AgelessRx PEARL (48 weeks, ~150 subjects) showed preliminary visceral fat reduction signal. None of these are lifespan endpoints, though they align with healthspan extension mechanisms.

What's the right longevity dose of rapamycin?

Community and clinical consensus is 3 to 8 mg once weekly, with 6 mg being a common starting dose for adults 50+. This is dramatically lower than the transplant dose (typically 2 to 5 mg daily) that causes immunosuppression. The key mechanism reason: weekly intermittent dosing selectively targets mTORC1 while sparing mTORC2 per Lamming 2012; continuous daily dosing disrupts both complexes, producing the metabolic side effects (insulin resistance, immune suppression) seen at transplant doses. Trough blood levels on weekly dosing typically run 5 to 15 ng/mL (vs 5 to 15 ng/mL target for transplant but with continuous daily exposure). CYP3A5 polymorphisms significantly affect metabolism; some individuals need level monitoring to land in the target range. Starting low (3 mg) and titrating to effect or target blood level is conservative and appropriate.

Is low-dose rapamycin safe long-term?

Low-dose intermittent rapamycin has a substantially different safety profile than transplant dosing. Zero cases of pneumonitis have been reported at longevity doses (3 to 8 mg weekly), though pneumonitis is idiosyncratic and can be fatal at oncology doses (2 to 15 percent incidence). No catastrophic floor triggered because zero cases exist at longevity doses and the mechanism appears dose-dependent. Lipid elevation (15 to 30 percent) and potential insulin resistance from chronic mTORC2 disruption are real metabolic concerns. Wound healing impairment requires holding the drug 1 to 2 weeks before and after surgery. Mouth ulcers (aphthous stomatitis) occur in 5 to 15 percent of trial participants and 20 to 40 percent of forum users. No long-term controlled safety data beyond ~12 months in healthy adults (PEARL 48 weeks was the longest). Safety Risk scored 2.8 reflects real pharmacological risks, but well below the catastrophic floor.

What side effects should I expect from rapamycin?

Most common: mouth ulcers (5 to 15 percent in clinical trials, 20 to 40 percent in community surveys) presenting as aphthous stomatitis within days of dosing, typically resolving within a week. Lipid elevation: LDL and triglycerides rise 15 to 30 percent in a subset of users and require monitoring. Mild GI effects in early weeks. Fatigue on dose day is a common forum complaint. Acne or skin changes occasionally reported. Insulin resistance emerges in roughly 10 percent with chronic use and may be more common with daily than weekly dosing (mTORC2 mechanism). Most side effects are manageable with dose adjustment, supportive care (L-lysine or colloidal silver for mouth ulcers), and lipid-management supplements like berberine or bergamot if needed. Dropout from longevity protocols is typically 10 to 20 percent due to side effects.

How do I find a doctor who prescribes rapamycin for longevity?

Several legitimate paths. Telehealth longevity services including AgelessRx and Healthspan offer rapamycin prescribing with integrated blood work monitoring; convenient and affordable but requires navigating their protocols. Longevity and functional medicine clinics including Healthspan Clinic, Modern Aging, and individual longevity-oriented physicians prescribe increasingly frequently; find via word-of-mouth in longevity community forums, podcast listener communities, and directories like the American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine. Primary care physicians rarely prescribe off-label rapamycin without specialty referral. Geroscience-trained physicians are the target: those who have attended conferences like TAME, RAADfest, or the American Academy of Anti-Aging Medicine. Dr. Alan Green was a pioneer but is not accepting new patients. Expect $200 to $400 initial visit + quarterly follow-ups plus blood work costs. Compounding pharmacies (Strive, Belmar, Empower) are preferred fill sources for the weekly-dose size.

Who should avoid rapamycin?

Seven contraindications. History of interstitial lung disease or pneumonitis (even at low doses the mechanism exists). Active immunosuppression from other drugs (tacrolimus, cyclosporine, corticosteroids, chemotherapy). HIV infection with low CD4 count. Pregnancy, planning pregnancy within 3 months, or breastfeeding (teratogenic class C). Upcoming surgery without 1 to 2 week drug-free window. Active infection including recurrent herpes, hepatitis, or tuberculosis. Concurrent CYP3A4 inhibitors (ketoconazole, clarithromycin, ritonavir, grapefruit) without prescriber guidance on dose adjustment. Relative cautions include unwillingness to do regular blood work, lipid disorders already requiring management, type 2 diabetes with HbA1c above 8, age under 40 (risk-benefit likely unfavorable), elite WADA-tested athletes (not on banned list but complicates immune health during training blocks).

Can I stack rapamycin with metformin, NAD+, or senolytics?

Rapamycin stacks cleanly with most longevity protocols. Metformin is frequently combined, though 2025 data suggested metformin may blunt some rapamycin benefits in animals; Nir Barzilai's TAME trial is the standard reference. NAD+ precursors (NMN, NR) target an orthogonal mechanism (sirtuin activation, NAD pool restoration) and are commonly stacked. Senolytics (quercetin, fisetin, dasatinib) complement mTORC1 inhibition with direct senescent-cell elimination; Peter Attia's protocol pairs rapamycin weekly with monthly senolytic cycles. Exercise, sauna, and caloric restriction all activate autophagy pathways that rapamycin also engages; stacking reinforces the mechanism but the marginal return declines. Creatine, omega-3, vitamin D, and magnesium are all neutral-positive with rapamycin. Avoid high-dose BCAAs around dose days (mTORC1 activation counter to the mTORC1 inhibition goal). Avoid grapefruit during the dosing day (CYP3A4 inhibition increases peak blood level).

How This Score Could Change

BioHarmony scores are living assessments. New research, regulatory changes, or personal context can shift the score up or down. These are the most likely scenarios that would change this intervention's rating.

ScenarioDimension shiftsNew Score
Large human RCT (n=500+) confirms healthspan extensionEvidence 2.8โ†’3.8, Efficacy 3.2โ†’4.07.2 / 10 ๐Ÿ’ช Strong recommend
Pneumonitis case confirmed at longevity doseSafety 2.8โ†’4.0 (catastrophic floor triggered)5.9 / 10 โš–๏ธ Neutral
Dog Aging Project TRIAD shows significant healthspan extensionEvidence 2.8โ†’3.3, Efficacy 3.2โ†’3.56.9 / 10 ๐Ÿ‘ Worth trying
Long-term data (5+ years) confirms lipid/glucose harm in healthy adultsSafety 2.8โ†’3.5, Side Effects 2.5โ†’3.55.9 / 10 โš–๏ธ Neutral
Independent replication of Mannick immune findingsEvidence 2.8โ†’3.56.8 / 10 ๐Ÿ‘ Worth trying
PEARL 5-year extension confirms visceral fat and healthspan benefitEvidence 2.8โ†’3.5, Efficacy 3.2โ†’3.6, Breadth 3.8โ†’4.27.2 / 10 ๐Ÿ’ช Strong recommend

Key Evidence Sources

Other interventions for Autophagy

See all ratings โ†’
๐Ÿ“Š How BioHarmony scoring works

BioHarmony translates a weighted expected-value calculation into a reader-facing 0โ€“10 score. 5.0 is neutral (benefits and risks balance). Above 5 = benefits outweigh risks; below 5 = risks outweigh benefits.

Harm-type downsides (safety risk, side effects, reversibility, dependency) carry a 1.4× precautionary multiplier. Harm weighs more than benefit. Opportunity-type downsides (financial cost, time/effort, opportunity cost) are subtracted at face value.

Use case subratings are independent assessments of how well the intervention addresses specific health goals. They are not components of the overall score. Each subrating reflects the scorer's judgment based on use-case-specific evidence, safety, and effect sizes.

Every dimension is evaluated on a 1–5 scale, and the baseline (1) is subtracted before weighting. A perfect intervention with zero downsides contributes zero penalty rather than a residual floor, so top-tier scores are actually reachable.

EV = Upside − Downside
EV = 2.150 − 1.343 = 0.807
EV ranges from −5 to +5. Adding 7 shifts to 2–12, dividing by 12 normalizes to 0–1, then ×10 gives the 0–10 score.
Score = ((0.807 + 7) / 12) × 10 = 6.5 / 10

See the full BioHarmony methodology โ†’

Further learning

This report is educational and informational. It is not medical advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Consult a qualified healthcare provider before starting any new supplement, device, protocol, or intervention, particularly if you take prescription medications, have a chronic health condition, are pregnant or nursing, or are under 18.