Senolytics (Fisetin + Quercetin)
Senolytics (fisetin + quercetin OTC combination, or prescription dasatinib + quercetin) selectively kill senescent cells by targeting their anti-apoptotic survival networks (BCL-2, BCL-xL, PI3K/AKT). Yousefzadeh 2018 showed fisetin extended mouse median lifespan ~10% late in life. Hickson 2019 D+Q human pilot (n=14) reduced senescent cell markers at 11 days. Zero published F+Q human senolytic efficacy data; AFFIRM-LITE trial results pending.
Senolytics (Fisetin + Quercetin) scored 6.8 / 10 (👍 Worth trying) on the BioHarmony scale as a Substance → Botanical Extract (non-adaptogenic).
What It Is
Type: Botanical extract stack (senolytic flavonoids: quercetin + fisetin).
Senolytics are compounds that selectively induce apoptosis in senescent cells by targeting their anti-apoptotic survival networks (BCL-2, BCL-xL, PI3K/AKT). Senescent cells accumulate with age, resist normal clearance, and secrete a pro-inflammatory cocktail called the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) that drives chronic inflammation and tissue dysfunction. van Deursen 2014 and Baker 2016 established the genetic and mechanistic case for senescent cell clearance as a longevity strategy. Zhu 2015 in the Kirkland lab at Mayo Clinic identified the pharmacological senolytic vulnerability and launched the translational program.
The most accessible senolytic combination for biohackers is fisetin (500 to 2,000 mg, typically 20 mg/kg for 2 consecutive days) plus quercetin (1,000 to 1,250 mg), both plant-derived flavonoids available over the counter. Fisetin primarily targets senescent endothelial and epithelial cells; quercetin targets senescent preadipocytes and endothelial cells. The complementary cell-type targeting is the rationale for combining them. Both are dosed in a 'hit-and-run' protocol (2 to 3 consecutive days per quarter), exploiting the fact that senescent cells, once killed, take weeks to months to reaccumulate.
The prescription alternative is dasatinib + quercetin (D+Q), which has stronger human pilot data but carries pharmaceutical-grade risks (PAH, QT prolongation, cytopenias). F+Q trades evidence strength for dramatically better safety and accessibility.
Current status: Nick owns F+Q and uses it infrequently. Considers senolytics increasingly important post-50.
Terminology
- SASP: Senescence-Associated Secretory Phenotype. Inflammatory cytokine/protease cocktail from senescent cells.
- BCL-2 / BCL-xL: Anti-apoptotic proteins upregulated in senescent cells; senolytic drug target.
- PI3K / AKT: Cell survival signaling pathway upregulated in senescent cells.
- F+Q: Fisetin + Quercetin (OTC senolytic combination).
- D+Q: Dasatinib + Quercetin (Rx senolytic combination; Kirkland lab pilot protocol).
- p16 / p21: Cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors; senescence biomarkers.
- GRAS: Generally Recognized As Safe (FDA designation).
- GRN 341: Quercetin GRAS notice number.
- AFFIRM-LITE: Mayo Clinic fisetin frailty RCT (NCT03675724).
- PAH: Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (dasatinib risk).
- QT prolongation: Cardiac repolarization delay; dasatinib risk.
- IPF: Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis.
- HSC: Hematopoietic Stem Cell.
- CYP3A4: Liver cytochrome P450 enzyme; quercetin inhibits.
- DOAC: Direct Oral Anticoagulant (e.g., apixaban, rivaroxaban).
Dosing & Protocols
Dosing information is summarized from published research and community reports. This is not a prescribing guide. Consult a healthcare provider before starting any protocol.
View 3 routes and 5 protocols
Routes & Forms
| Route | Form | Clinical Range | Community Range |
|---|---|---|---|
| oral | Fisetin capsule (standardized extract) | N/A (no FDA indication) | 1,000-2,000 mg (~20 mg/kg body weight) for 2 consecutive days |
| oral | Quercetin capsule | N/A | 1,000-1,250 mg for 2 consecutive days |
| oral | Dasatinib + Quercetin (D+Q, Rx) | Dasatinib 100 mg + quercetin 1,250 mg | 3 consecutive days monthly |
Protocols
F+Q quarterly hit-and-run Anecdotal
- Dose
- Fisetin 1-2g + quercetin 1-1.25g
- Frequency
- Quarterly (every 3 months)
- Duration
- Indefinite cycling
Community standard. 2 consecutive days. Nick's protocol when he uses it
F+Q extended pulse Anecdotal
- Dose
- Fisetin 1-2g + quercetin 1-1.25g
- Frequency
- 3 consecutive days monthly
- Duration
- Indefinite cycling
Modeled after D+Q monthly dosing; extended version of hit-and-run
D+Q clinical (under supervision) Clinical
- Dose
- Dasatinib 100 mg + quercetin 1,250 mg
- Frequency
- 3 consecutive days monthly
- Duration
- Per clinical guidance
Requires Rx, cardiology/pulmonology screening; stronger evidence but higher risk
Post-chemotherapy / radiation Anecdotal
- Dose
- F+Q quarterly dosing
- Frequency
- Quarterly
- Duration
- 6-12 months post-treatment
Emerging protocol for clearing treatment-induced senescent cells; coordinate with oncology
Pre-senolytic biomarker strategy Anecdotal
- Dose
- F+Q, timing based on p16/p21 biomarkers
- Frequency
- Per biomarker reading
- Duration
- Ongoing
Emerging: test plasma senescence markers; dose when elevated. Mayo research ongoing
How this score is calculated →
Upside (1.79 / 5.00)
| Dimension | Weight | Score | Visual | Weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Efficacy | 25% | 2.5 | 0.625 | |
| Breadth of Benefits | 15% | 4.2 | 0.630 | |
| Evidence Quality | 25% | 1.8 | 0.450 | |
| Speed of Onset | 10% | 3.0 | 0.300 | |
| Durability | 10% | 3.0 | 0.300 | |
| Bioindividuality Upside | 15% | 3.2 | 0.480 | |
| Total | 2.785 |
Upside Rationale
Efficacy (2.5/5.0): The preclinical signal for fisetin is strong. Yousefzadeh 2018 showed fisetin extended median mouse lifespan by approximately 10% when administered late in life, reduced senescent cell markers across multiple tissues, and improved physical function. However, zero published human trials have confirmed fisetin's senolytic efficacy. The AFFIRM-LITE trial (Mayo Clinic, NCT03675724) and COVID-FISETIN trials are registered but results remain unpublished. Quercetin's senolytic contribution has been demonstrated only in combination with dasatinib in human pilots (Justice 2019, Hickson 2019), so its independent contribution is unclear. The F+Q combination specifically has essentially no clinical data. The mechanistic rationale is sound (complementary BCL-2/BCL-xL targeting across different senescent cell populations), but the translational gap between mouse lifespan extension and human clinical benefit remains entirely unbridged for this specific combination.
Breadth of Benefits (4.2/5.0): Senescence is a systemic driver of aging across virtually every organ system. Published or ongoing human trials for the senolytic class span idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, diabetic kidney disease, Alzheimer's disease, skin aging, and physical function decline. If senescent cell clearance works as theorized, the downstream benefits should span cardiovascular, pulmonary, metabolic, neurological, musculoskeletal, and dermatological systems. This breadth score reflects the class mechanism, not F+Q-specific data.
Evidence Quality (1.8/5.0): This is the weakest dimension for F+Q. Fisetin has zero published human senolytic efficacy data. The strongest human evidence for senolytics comes from D+Q pilots (combined n of roughly 60 patients, open-label, maximum 14-week follow-up), which does not directly transfer to F+Q. Yousefzadeh 2018 is a single mouse study, albeit from a top lab. The UBX0101 Phase II failure in knee OA and the Mareschal 2024 epigenetic clock finding introduce additional class-level uncertainty. The evidence base for F+Q specifically is approximately where D+Q was before any human trials were conducted: strong preclinical rationale, zero clinical validation.
Speed of Onset (3.0/5.0): Based on class-level data, biomarker changes (reduced senescent cell markers) were detectable at 11 days post-dosing in Hickson 2019 using D+Q. The hit-and-run mechanism means effects develop over weeks as SASP levels decline and tissue repair proceeds. F+Q is expected to follow similar kinetics given the shared mechanism of action.
Durability (3.0/5.0): The hit-and-run design implies durable effects between dosing cycles, since killed senescent cells do not regenerate immediately. Reaccumulation rate in humans is unknown. Quarterly dosing appears sufficient based on D+Q protocols. If senescent cell clearance is as durable as preclinical models suggest, this is a meaningful advantage over daily-dose interventions.
Bioindividuality Upside (3.2/5.0): Response is strongly age-dependent. Older individuals (50+) carry substantially higher senescent cell burden and stand to benefit most. Younger adults (<40) likely have minimal senescent accumulation, making the intervention largely unnecessary and potentially counterproductive (senescence has tumor-suppressive functions). Chronic disease states associated with accelerated senescence (obesity, diabetes, fibrosis) may also predict stronger response.
Downside (0.59 / 5.00)
| Dimension | Weight | Score | Visual | Weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Safety Risk | 30% | 1.5 | 0.450 | |
| Side Effect Profile | 15% | 1.3 | 0.195 | |
| Financial Cost | 5% | 1.3 | 0.065 | |
| Time/Effort Burden | 5% | 1.2 | 0.060 | |
| Opportunity Cost | 5% | 1.3 | 0.065 | |
| Dependency / Withdrawal | 15% | 1.0 | 0.150 | |
| Reversibility | 25% | 1.8 | 0.450 | |
| Total | 1.435 | |||
| Harm subtotal × 1.4 | 1.743 | |||
| Opportunity subtotal × 1.0 | 0.190 | |||
| Combined downside | 1.933 | |||
| Baseline offset (constant) | −1.340 | |||
| Effective downside penalty | 0.593 |
Downside Rationale
Safety Risk (1.5/5.0): This is where F+Q diverges dramatically from D+Q. Neither fisetin nor quercetin is a pharmaceutical. Quercetin holds GRAS status (GRN 341). Fisetin has limited human safety data but no serious adverse events in any published trial or study. Removing dasatinib eliminates every pharmaceutical-grade risk: no pulmonary arterial hypertension, no QT prolongation, no cytopenias, no black box warnings. The primary concerns are CYP3A4 inhibition by quercetin (relevant for drug interactions during the dosing window) and anticoagulant potentiation by both compounds (fisetin has inherent anti-platelet activity; quercetin potentiates warfarin). These are manageable interaction risks, not standalone toxicity risks.
Side Effect Profile (1.3/5.0): Both compounds are well-tolerated at supplemental doses. High-dose fisetin (1,000-2,000 mg) can cause mild GI discomfort in some individuals. Quercetin at 1,000-1,250 mg is generally uneventful. No chronic side effects are expected given the intermittent dosing model.
Financial Cost (1.3/5.0): Fisetin runs approximately $20-40 for a quarterly dosing cycle. Quercetin is approximately $10-15 per cycle. Total annual cost: under $200. One of the cheapest interventions in the longevity space.
Time/Effort Burden (1.2/5.0): Two consecutive days of pill-taking per quarter. No special preparation, no monitoring requirements beyond standard awareness of drug interactions. Total active time commitment: under 2 minutes per cycle.
Opportunity Cost (1.3/5.0): The 2-day dosing window is short enough that it does not conflict with other interventions. The main consideration is quercetin's CYP3A4 inhibition, which requires awareness of drug interactions during and briefly after the dosing window.
Dependency/Withdrawal (1.0/5.0): Zero dependency by design. Hit-and-run dosing means the compounds are absent from the body for 99%+ of the time.
Reversibility (1.8/5.0): Senescent cell clearance is irreversible by design: that is the mechanism of action. If the correct cells are cleared, this is a feature. If unintended cell populations are affected, or if cleared senescent cells were performing a tumor-suppressive function, the consequences cannot be undone by stopping the supplement. However, without dasatinib's broad kinase inhibition, the risk of off-target cellular effects is meaningfully lower than D+Q.
Verdict
✅ Best for: Adults over 50 with measurable signs of age-related decline (reduced physical function, chronic low-grade inflammation, fibrotic conditions). Biohackers who want the senolytic mechanism without pharmaceutical risk or prescription requirements. Those with accelerated biological aging from chronic disease. Anyone seeking a low-cost, low-effort, low-risk longevity intervention with strong preclinical rationale. Those who want to start with the safest senolytic protocol while waiting for human trial data. For those comfortable with off-label pharmaceuticals and wanting stronger clinical evidence, D+Q remains the more evidence-backed alternative (requires prescription dasatinib).
❌ Avoid if: You are under 40 with no signs of accelerated aging (senescent cell burden is low, risk/reward is unfavorable). You take anticoagulants (quercetin potentiates warfarin; fisetin has inherent anti-platelet activity). You are on medications metabolized by CYP3A4 (quercetin inhibits this enzyme during the dosing window). You require Phase 3-validated evidence before trying any intervention. You want proven clinical outcomes rather than preclinical extrapolation. Active cancer or recent cancer history (senescence has tumor-suppressive functions; theoretical concern worth discussing with oncologist).
Use Case Breakdown
The overall BioHarmony score reflects the intervention's primary evidence profile. These subratings are independent assessments per use case.
| Use Case | Score | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| ✅ Cellular Senescence | 8.2 | Direct mechanism: selective senescent cell apoptosis via BCL-2/BCL-xL pathway |
| 💪 Healthspan | 7.0 | Physical function improvements in mice; SASP reduction reduces age-related inflammation |
| 💪 Anti-Inflammatory | 7.0 | SASP suppression eliminates pro-inflammatory cytokine source |
| 👍 Longevity / Lifespan | 6.8 | Yousefzadeh 2018 mouse lifespan +10%; mechanism supports healthspan; human data pending |
| 👍 Antioxidant / Oxidative Stress | 6.5 | Both fisetin and quercetin are polyphenol antioxidants; complementary to senolytic mechanism |
| 👍 Bone / Joint Health | 6.5 | Senescent preosteoblast clearance; Xu 2018 mouse bone improvement |
| 👍 Stem Cell Support | 6.5 | Chang 2016 HSC rejuvenation; stem cell niche senescence |
| 👍 Respiratory | 6.3 | Justice 2019 IPF pilot: D+Q physical function improvement |
| 👍 Cardiovascular | 6.2 | Senescent endothelial cell clearance supports vascular function; preclinical evidence |
| 👍 Skin / Beauty | 6.2 | Senescent fibroblast clearance; skin aging mechanism |
| 👍 Kidney Function | 6.0 | Hickson 2019 D+Q diabetic kidney disease preliminary benefit |
| 👍 Neuroprotection | 6.0 | Senescent cell clearance in aging brain; preclinical and early clinical |
| 👍 Metabolic Health | 6.0 | Senescent preadipocyte clearance; metabolic syndrome preclinical |
| 👍 Immune Function | 6.0 | Senescent immune cells contribute to immunosenescence; clearance supports function |
| 👍 Telomere / DNA Repair | 5.8 | Senescent cells carry DNA damage and telomere dysfunction; clearance reduces burden |
| 👍 Recovery / Repair | 5.8 | Tissue remodeling depends on senescent cell clearance |
| ⚖️ Autophagy | 5.5 | Indirect via senescent cell clearance and cellular renewal |
| ⚖️ Cognition / Focus | 5.5 | Senescent glial clearance mechanism; Alzheimer's Phase 1 completed (Gonzales 2023) |
| ⚖️ Mitochondrial | 5.5 | Senescent cells have mitochondrial dysfunction; clearance supports mitochondrial pool quality |
| ⚖️ Injury Recovery | 5.5 | Senescent cells impair healing; clearance supports repair |
| ⚖️ Methylation Support | 5.5 | Epigenetic age signal mixed; Mareschal 2024 showed unexpected acceleration |
| ⚖️ Energy / Fatigue | 5.5 | Reduced SASP inflammation can improve subjective energy |
| ⚖️ Hormonal / Endocrine | 5.0 | Indirect via metabolic and endocrine cell senescence clearance |
| ⚖️ Libido / Sexual Health | 4.8 | Indirect via metabolic and hormonal improvements |
Frequently Asked Questions
What are senolytics and how do they work?
Senolytics are compounds that selectively induce apoptosis in senescent cells by targeting their anti-apoptotic survival networks. Senescent cells accumulate with age, resist normal clearance, and secrete the senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP): a pro-inflammatory cocktail of cytokines (IL-6, IL-8, TNF-alpha) and matrix-degrading enzymes that drives chronic inflammation and tissue dysfunction. Normal cells depend on BCL-2/BCL-xL and PI3K/AKT signaling for survival, but senescent cells become especially dependent on these pathways. Zhu 2015 (Kirkland lab) demonstrated this vulnerability; senolytics exploit it by blocking these survival signals, triggering apoptosis selectively in senescent cells while sparing healthy cells. The 'hit-and-run' dosing model (2 consecutive days every 1-3 months) reflects that once senescent cells are killed, they take weeks to months to reaccumulate.
Fisetin + Quercetin vs Dasatinib + Quercetin: which?
Different evidence tiers, different risk profiles. D+Q (dasatinib 100 mg + quercetin 1,250 mg for 3 consecutive days monthly) has the strongest human pilot data: Hickson 2019 showed reduced senescent cell markers in diabetic kidney disease at 11 days post-dose; Justice 2019 showed improved physical function in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Dasatinib is a prescription tyrosine kinase inhibitor with real risks: pulmonary arterial hypertension, QT prolongation, cytopenias, black box warnings. F+Q (fisetin 20 mg/kg + quercetin 1,000-1,250 mg for 2 consecutive days quarterly) trades evidence strength for dramatically better safety. Both fisetin and quercetin are OTC polyphenols with decades of safe consumption data. Zero published F+Q human senolytic RCTs; fisetin extends mouse lifespan ~10% (Yousefzadeh 2018). F+Q is the right entry point for most biohackers; D+Q for those with clinical supervision and specific indication.
Does fisetin actually work as a senolytic in humans?
Not yet proven in humans. Yousefzadeh 2018 showed fisetin extended median mouse lifespan by approximately 10 percent when administered late in life, reduced senescent cell markers across multiple tissues, and improved physical function. Human senolytic RCTs are ongoing: AFFIRM-LITE at Mayo Clinic studying fisetin in frail elderly adults, COVID-FISETIN for post-acute COVID sequelae, and FISIOS for skeletal frailty. Results remain unpublished as of April 2026. Hickson 2019 D+Q pilot (n=14) showed reduced senescent cell markers at 11 days, but that is D+Q not F+Q. Quercetin's senolytic contribution has been demonstrated only in combination with dasatinib in human pilots, so its independent contribution is unclear. The mechanistic rationale for F+Q is sound (complementary BCL-2/BCL-xL targeting across different senescent cell populations), but the translational gap between mouse lifespan extension and human clinical benefit remains entirely unbridged for this specific combination.
How do I run a senolytic protocol?
Community-standard F+Q protocol: fisetin 1,000 to 2,000 mg (roughly 20 mg/kg body weight) + quercetin 1,000 to 1,250 mg, taken together for 2 consecutive days, repeated quarterly (every 3 months). Take with a fat-containing meal (both are fat-soluble, absorption increases substantially with dietary fat). Some community members extend to 3 consecutive days modeled after D+Q protocols. Hold any CYP3A4-metabolized medications during and for 1 to 2 days after the dosing window (quercetin is a CYP3A4 inhibitor). Pause fish oil, vitamin E, garlic, ginkgo, and anticoagulants 48 hours before and during dosing (additive bleeding risk from fisetin's anti-platelet activity). The hit-and-run pattern exploits the fact that senescent cells take weeks to months to reaccumulate; daily dosing is unnecessary and potentially counterproductive (senescence has tumor-suppressive functions in healthy young cells).
Are senolytics safe?
F+Q is generally well-tolerated. Quercetin holds GRAS status (GRN 341). Fisetin has limited human safety data but no serious adverse events in any published trial or study. Removing dasatinib eliminates pharmaceutical-grade risks: no pulmonary arterial hypertension, no QT prolongation, no cytopenias. Primary concerns: CYP3A4 inhibition by quercetin (relevant for drug interactions during the 2-day dosing window and roughly 24 hours after), anticoagulant potentiation by both compounds (fisetin has inherent anti-platelet activity; quercetin potentiates warfarin), and mild GI discomfort at high doses. D+Q carries substantially different risk profile: dasatinib black box warnings and specific monitoring requirements; should only be used under clinical supervision with cardiology and pulmonology screening. The theoretical concern for all senolytics: senescence has tumor-suppressive functions in healthy young cells, so using senolytics prematurely (under age 40-50) may have unintended consequences the community cannot yet quantify.
When should I start taking senolytics?
Most experts suggest age 50+ as the likely threshold where senescent cell burden becomes high enough to justify senolytic intervention. Senescent cells accumulate progressively with age but remain modest in young adults. Yousefzadeh 2018 mouse data showed strongest lifespan extension when treatment began late in life, consistent with the higher senescent burden that makes senolytics effective. Chronic disease states that accelerate senescence (obesity, diabetes, fibrosis, post-chemotherapy) may lower the meaningful intervention age. Young healthy adults using senolytics quarterly likely see minimal benefit (few senescent cells to kill) and may incur theoretical downside from removing cells performing tumor-suppressive functions. Nick's position: has F+Q on hand, uses infrequently because young, and considers senolytics increasingly important post-50. Emerging biomarkers including senescent cell plasma markers (from Mayo Clinic research) may eventually enable personalized timing rather than age-based rules.
Who should avoid senolytics?
Five populations. Active cancer or recent cancer history: senescence has tumor-suppressive functions; clearing senescent cells could theoretically remove a protective barrier, though the net effect is debated and still under investigation. Concurrent anticoagulant use (warfarin, DOAC, high-dose aspirin): quercetin potentiates warfarin, fisetin has inherent anti-platelet activity; hold both 48 hours before and during dosing. Medications strongly dependent on CYP3A4 metabolism (statins, calcium channel blockers, certain immunosuppressants, some antidepressants): quercetin CYP3A4 inhibition during dosing window could increase drug levels; consult prescriber. Pregnancy or breastfeeding (safety data insufficient). Severe renal or hepatic impairment (clearance uncertain). Young adults under 40 without accelerated aging signs (risk-benefit uncertain; likely minimal benefit, small theoretical downside from affecting tumor-suppressive senescent cell populations).
How This Score Could Change
BioHarmony scores are living assessments. New research, regulatory changes, or personal context can shift the score up or down. These are the most likely scenarios that would change this intervention's rating.
| Scenario | Dimension shifts | New Score |
|---|---|---|
| AFFIRM-LITE publishes positive fisetin senolytic data | Evidence 1.8→3.0, Efficacy 2.5→3.2 | 7.5 / 10 💪 Strong recommend |
| D+Q Phase 3 RCT validates senolytic class (n>200) | Evidence 1.8→2.8, Efficacy 2.5→3.0 | 7.3 / 10 💪 Strong recommend |
| CYP3A4 interaction causes SAE in combination user | Safety 1.5→2.5 | 6.5 / 10 👍 Worth trying |
| Yousefzadeh mouse lifespan extension fails to replicate | Efficacy 2.5→1.8 | 6.4 / 10 👍 Worth trying |
| 5-year follow-up data confirms zero SAEs in 200+ users | Safety 1.5→1.2 | 7.0 / 10 💪 Strong recommend |
| Epigenetic clock acceleration signal confirmed (Mareschal 2024 replicated) | Safety 1.5→2.5, Efficacy 2.5→2.0 | 6.1 / 10 👍 Worth trying |
Key Evidence Sources
- Yousefzadeh MJ, Zhu Y, McGowan SJ et al. 2018, EBioMedicine. Fisetin is a senotherapeutic that extends health and lifespan.. Foundational fisetin senolytic mouse paper
- Hickson LJ, Langhi Prata LGP, Bobart SA et al. 2019, EBioMedicine. Senolytics decrease senescent cells in humans: preliminary report from a clinical trial of Dasatinib plus Quercetin in individuals with diabetic kidney disease.. First human senolytic pilot (D+Q, diabetic kidney disease)
- Justice JN, Nambiar AM, Tchkonia T et al. 2019, EBioMedicine. Senolytics in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: results from a first-in-human, open-label, pilot study.. IPF senolytic pilot (D+Q)
- Zhu Y, Tchkonia T, Pirtskhalava T et al. 2015, Aging Cell. The Achilles' heel of senescent cells: from transcriptome to senolytic drugs.. Foundational Kirkland lab senolytic discovery
- Xu M, Pirtskhalava T, Farr JN et al. 2018, Nature Medicine. Senolytics improve physical function and increase lifespan in old age.. Mouse physical function improvement
- Chang J, Wang Y, Shao L et al. 2016, Nature Medicine. Clearance of senescent cells by ABT263 rejuvenates aged hematopoietic stem cells in mice.. HSC rejuvenation mouse proof
- Baker DJ, Childs BG, Durik M et al. 2016, Nature. Naturally occurring p16Ink4a-positive cells shorten healthy lifespan.. Genetic senescent cell clearance lifespan proof
- van Deursen JM. 2014, Nature. The role of senescent cells in ageing.. Core senescence review
- Kirkland JL, Tchkonia T. 2020, EBioMedicine. Senolytic drugs: from discovery to translation.. Translation review
- Gonzales MM, Garbarino VR, Kautz TF et al. 2023, Nature Medicine. Senolytic therapy in mild Alzheimer's disease: a phase 1 feasibility trial.. Alzheimer's senolytic feasibility trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov AFFIRM-LITE: Fisetin for Frailty in Older Adults (NCT03675724). Mayo Clinic.. Ongoing fisetin Phase 2
- Mareschal J, Hautefort C, Thomas F et al. 2024, Aging. Dasatinib and quercetin: short-term simultaneous administration and its effect on epigenetic clock.. Epigenetic clock result (unexpected acceleration)
Other interventions for Cellular Senescence
See all ratings →📊 How BioHarmony scoring works
BioHarmony translates a weighted expected-value calculation into a reader-facing 0–10 score. 5.0 is neutral (benefits and risks balance). Above 5 = benefits outweigh risks; below 5 = risks outweigh benefits.
Harm-type downsides (safety risk, side effects, reversibility, dependency) carry a 1.4× precautionary multiplier. Harm weighs more than benefit. Opportunity-type downsides (financial cost, time/effort, opportunity cost) are subtracted at face value.
Use case subratings are independent assessments of how well the intervention addresses specific health goals. They are not components of the overall score. Each subrating reflects the scorer's judgment based on use-case-specific evidence, safety, and effect sizes.
Every dimension is evaluated on a 1–5 scale, and the baseline (1) is subtracted before weighting. A perfect intervention with zero downsides contributes zero penalty rather than a residual floor, so top-tier scores are actually reachable.
EV = Upside − Downside
EV = 1.785 − 0.593 = 1.192
EV ranges from −5 to +5. Adding 7 shifts to 2–12, dividing by 12 normalizes to 0–1, then ×10 gives the 0–10 score.
Score = ((1.192 + 7) / 12) × 10 = 6.8 / 10
Further learning

8 Best Senolytic Supplements to Rid Your “Zombie” Cells & Extend Healthspan
Senolytics help rid the body of defective cells and appear to slow the aging process.

Latest Insights from 53+ Longevity Experts
What are the hallmarks of aging? How exactly does our diet relate to our longevity and age-related issues? Chris Burres gives us the inside…
