BPC-157
BPC-157 is a 15-amino-acid body-protective-complex fragment with 150+ consistent rodent studies (Sikiric 2018 review) and a Gwyer 2019 tendon-healing synthesis showing accelerated repair, but zero Phase 3 human RCTs. Typical dose 250 to 500 mcg SC or arginine-salt oral daily.
BPC-157 scored 7.3 / 10 (๐ช Strong recommend) on the BioHarmony scale as a Substance โ Peptide โ Growth / Repair Peptide.
What It Is
BPC-157 (Body Protection Compound-157) is a synthetic 15-amino-acid peptide derived from a protective fragment of human gastric juice protein. It is one of the most widely used peptides in the biohacker and athletic recovery community, with applications spanning soft-tissue healing, tendon and ligament repair, gut healing, and joint recovery.
Type: Peptide (15-amino-acid body-protective-complex fragment; gray-market research peptide, arginine salt oral bioavailable).
Current status: FDA Category 2 ("significant safety risks") for 503A compounding as of Sept 2023. WADA-banned under S0 (non-approved substances) since 2022. Available via research-chemical and gray-market channels. The arginine salt form (not acetate) provides meaningful oral bioavailability. Nick is actively using BPC-157 and rates it 7.1 / 10 personally.
Terminology
- VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor, a signaling protein that drives new blood-vessel formation. VEGFR2 is its receptor on endothelial cells.
- NO: nitric oxide, a short-lived gaseous signaling molecule that relaxes vasculature and increases local blood flow.
- eNOS: endothelial nitric oxide synthase, the enzyme that produces NO in blood-vessel lining.
- 5-HT: 5-hydroxytryptamine, also known as serotonin. BPC-157 stabilizes 5-HT signaling in rodent CNS models.
- Prostaglandin: lipid-derived signaling molecule involved in inflammation and tissue protection.
- NSAID-protection: the observation in rodent models that BPC-157 counteracts gastric and other damage caused by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.
- Anastomosis: a surgical or spontaneous connection between two tubular structures (blood vessels, bowel segments). BPC-157 accelerates anastomotic healing in animal surgery models.
- Gastric Juice Pentadecapeptide: the 15-amino-acid fragment of a larger gastric protective protein from which BPC-157 was isolated. Same molecule, different name.
- SC: subcutaneous injection (into fat below the skin).
- IM: intramuscular injection.
- SL: sublingual (dissolved under the tongue).
- Sikiric lab: the Zagreb-based research group (led by Predrag Sikiric) responsible for roughly 60% of published BPC-157 literature.
Dosing & Protocols
Dosing information is summarized from published research and community reports. This is not a prescribing guide. Consult a healthcare provider before starting any protocol.
View 3 routes and 5 protocols
Routes & Forms
| Route | Form | Clinical Range | Community Range |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oral (arginine salt capsule) | Arginine-salt capsule, 250 to 500 mcg | 250 to 500 mcg/day | 250 to 500 mcg twice daily for gut protocols |
| Subcutaneous injection (acetate salt) | Lyophilized acetate vial reconstituted in bacteriostatic water | 250 to 500 mcg/day | up to 750 mcg/day during acute injury |
| Topical / intranasal (gray-market) | Compounded cream 1 mcg per g, or nasal spray | 1 mcg/g cream | 1 mcg/g cream; 200 to 500 mcg intranasal daily |
Protocols
Acute soft-tissue recovery Mixed
- Dose
- 250 to 500 mcg SC 1 to 2x/day near injury site
- Frequency
- 1 to 2x/day
- Duration
- 4 to 8 weeks
Most common use case. Stack with rehab and load management.
Maintenance / longevity Anecdotal
- Dose
- 200 to 250 mcg SC 1x/day
- Frequency
- daily
- Duration
- 4 weeks on / 2 off
Cycling approach. No evidence of tolerance but conservative default.
Post-surgery recovery Anecdotal
- Dose
- 250 to 500 mcg SC 2x/day
- Frequency
- 2x/day
- Duration
- 2 to 6 weeks starting 48h post-op
Consult surgeon. Theoretical VEGFR2 interaction with graft vasculature.
GI / IBD protocol Mixed
- Dose
- 250 to 500 mcg oral arginine-salt 2x/day
- Frequency
- 2x/day
- Duration
- 4 to 12 weeks
Oral route intentional so peptide contacts GI mucosa.
Stacked with TB-500 Anecdotal
- Dose
- 250 to 500 mcg BPC-157 SC daily plus 2 to 2.5 mg TB-500 SC 2x/week
- Frequency
- daily + 2x/week
- Duration
- 4 to 6 weeks
Most popular soft-tissue combo. No head-to-head RCT.
How this score is calculated →
Upside (2.73 / 5.00)
| Dimension | Weight | Score | Visual | Weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Efficacy | 25% | 4.3 | 1.075 | |
| Breadth of Benefits | 15% | 4.0 | 0.600 | |
| Evidence Quality | 25% | 3.0 | 0.750 | |
| Speed of Onset | 10% | 3.5 | 0.350 | |
| Durability | 10% | 3.5 | 0.350 | |
| Bioindividuality Upside | 15% | 4.0 | 0.600 | |
| Total | 3.725 |
Upside Rationale
Efficacy (4.3 / 5.0). The rodent literature is unusually consistent across labs, endpoints, and injury models (Sikiric 2018 review): Achilles tenotomy restores biomechanical strength, gastric and duodenal ulcers show 40 to 80% area reduction, colitis scores drop, skin wounds close faster, and myotendinous junction heals after surgical transection. The real-world human signal is massive and consistent across forums, clinics, and athletic recovery communities (N in the tens of thousands), with users reporting dramatic improvements in tendon, ligament, and soft-tissue recovery. WADA banned BPC-157 specifically because athletes were gaining measurable competitive benefit, which is a revealed-preference signal that real efficacy exists even without Phase 3 confirmation.
Breadth of benefits (4.0 / 5.0). BPC-157 covers a remarkably wide application surface: musculoskeletal (tendon, ligament, muscle, myotendinous junction), GI (gastric and duodenal ulcers, IBD, leaky gut), CNS (TBI, stroke, neuroprotection in rodent ischemia), wound healing, joint recovery, peripheral nerve repair, and vascular protection. Few peptides or small molecules cover this breadth of plausibly evidenced applications. The breadth is mechanistically grounded in three general pathways (nitric oxide, VEGFR2 angiogenesis, growth-factor modulation) that operate across tissue types, which is why the effect keeps showing up in new models. Scored 4.0 rather than 4.5 because breadth is measured in animal work, not confirmed in humans.
Evidence quality (3.0 / 5.0). Zero published human efficacy RCTs and only three small human pilot studies total (IV safety n=2, interstitial cystitis n=12, an intra-articular knee study). Roughly 200 rodent papers cover the mechanism and efficacy, but the Sikiric/Zagreb group authors about 60% of that literature, which is a concentration-of-evidence concern independent replicators need to address. Offsetting that, the anecdotal base is unusually large and consistent across independent communities (athletes, clinicians, injury-recovery patients), and WADA's ban is revealed-preference evidence that the effect is real. The v0.5 evidence grade reflects "strong mechanism plus strong anecdote minus missing RCTs."
Speed of onset (3.5 / 5.0). User reports and rodent injury models agree on a fast subjective onset for soft-tissue targets: 3 to 14 days for pain reduction and range-of-motion improvement, and 2 to 6 weeks for structural endpoints like tendon biomechanical strength or ulcer closure. This is faster than most collagen or cartilage interventions and comparable to peptide growth-hormone secretagogues for recovery endpoints. Onset for CNS and gut protocols is slower and less consistent (4 to 12 weeks), which pulls the composite speed score down from 4.0.
Durability (3.5 / 5.0). For acute injury cycles, community reports and rodent follow-up data converge on the same finding: once tissue has healed, the recovery persists without continued dosing. The peptide drives a repair process rather than masking a symptom, so the gain tends to stick. Chronic condition benefits (IBD maintenance, ongoing joint protection) tend to fade without continued use, which is expected because the underlying disease process does not remit. 3.5 reflects a durable acute-injury outcome plus a use-dependent chronic outcome.
Bioindividuality upside (4.0 / 5.0). Very few non-responder reports exist in the community literature, which is itself unusual. BPC-157 appears to work across age, sex, injury type, and baseline healing capacity, probably because the three main mechanisms (nitric oxide, angiogenesis, growth-factor signaling) are universally expressed repair pathways rather than population-specific. Anecdotes from elite athletes, sedentary aging adults, post-surgical patients, and IBD sufferers all skew positive. The caveat is that "few non-responders" in an unblinded anecdotal population partly reflects expectation effects, so the score is capped at 4.0.
Downside (0.96 / 5.00)
| Dimension | Weight | Score | Visual | Weighted |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Safety Risk | 30% | 2.0 | 0.600 | |
| Side Effect Profile | 15% | 2.0 | 0.300 | |
| Financial Cost | 5% | 1.5 | 0.075 | |
| Time/Effort Burden | 5% | 2.5 | 0.125 | |
| Opportunity Cost | 5% | 2.0 | 0.100 | |
| Dependency / Withdrawal | 15% | 1.0 | 0.150 | |
| Reversibility | 25% | 1.5 | 0.375 | |
| Total | 1.725 | |||
| Harm subtotal ร 1.4 | 1.995 | |||
| Opportunity subtotal ร 1.0 | 0.300 | |||
| Combined downside | 2.295 | |||
| Baseline offset (constant) | −1.340 | |||
| Effective downside penalty | 0.955 |
Downside Rationale
Safety risk (2.0 / 5.0). No confirmed intrinsic catastrophic adverse events have emerged across 15+ years of widespread gray-market use (N in the tens of thousands). The theoretical VEGFR2-mediated angiogenesis concern (Hsieh 2017) is mechanism-plausible in cancer or pre-malignant populations but has not been clinically observed in the user community. Long-term safety data is genuinely absent rather than reassuring, and the FDA's Category 2 designation reflects that regulatory uncertainty. Score 2.0 (not 3.5 or 4.0) because there is no identified intrinsic fatal signal and the observed adverse event profile is mild, which distinguishes BPC-157 from class-flagged peptides like glucagon-like peptide agonists.
Side effect profile (2.0 / 5.0). Mild injection site reactions (erythema, transient bruising, minor soreness) are the most common adverse event across community reports. A minority cluster report transient palpitations, anxiety, or mild cardiovascular effects that resolve on discontinuation, consistent with nitric oxide-mediated vasodilation and potential dopamine-serotonin modulation in sensitive subjects. Oral arginine-salt capsules are generally well tolerated. There is no chronic side effect pattern that emerges in users who run extended cycles, which is notable given the size of the user base and the length of community follow-up.
Financial cost (1.5 / 5.0). BPC-157 is among the cheapest gray-market peptides. A typical 4 to 8 week cycle costs well under $100 at research-chemical pricing, and monthly maintenance runs about $40 to $80. Arginine-salt oral capsules are slightly more expensive per-mg than acetate injection vials but still inexpensive. Compared to rehab costs for an injury BPC-157 addresses (physical therapy, surgery, lost training time), the financial burden is trivial. 1.5 reflects the low absolute cost plus the need to budget for bacteriostatic water, syringes, and optionally third-party purity testing.
Time / effort burden (2.5 / 5.0). The baseline effort is meaningful but bounded. Subcutaneous injection once or twice per day during acute cycles requires reconstitution, sterile technique, rotating injection sites, and refrigeration, which is a real behavioral ask. The arginine-salt oral route collapses most of that burden to swallowing a capsule twice daily, which is why it is the preferred default for gut protocols and for users who tolerate oral bioavailability tradeoffs. Users willing to inject get faster local delivery near injury sites. 2.5 is a blended score across the two routes.
Opportunity cost (2.0 / 5.0). BPC-157 complements rather than substitutes for the mainstays of recovery: load management, sleep, protein intake, progressive rehab, and mechanical rest. It rarely displaces a better intervention because there is no rival peptide or small molecule doing the same thing at the same cost. The main opportunity cost is attention and curiosity budget spent on a gray-market peptide rather than on the boring fundamentals, which for most users is a small loss relative to the potential upside on a stalled injury. Stacking with TB-500 is the most common variant and adds to cost rather than creating a direct opportunity tradeoff.
Dependency / withdrawal (1.0 / 5.0). No adaptation, no receptor downregulation, and no withdrawal syndrome has been reported in community follow-up or rodent re-challenge studies. Users cycle on and off without rebound effects. The peptide is not psychoactive in a way that generates reinforcement, and it does not replace an endogenous signaling molecule users become dependent on. 1.0 is the floor of the scale because the absence of dependency is as clean here as for any intervention we score.
Reversibility (1.5 / 5.0). Effects are fully reversible on cessation. Tissue repair that occurred while dosing persists (the tissue is healed), but any ongoing protective or modulatory effect fades within days to weeks of discontinuation, matching the short plasma half-life. There are no known permanent alterations to VEGFR2 expression, nitric oxide signaling, or other pathways BPC-157 engages. 1.5 is near the reversibility floor and reflects clean on-off pharmacology.
Verdict
Best for: Acute soft-tissue injuries (tendon, ligament, muscle) in healthy adults. Post-surgical recovery cycles. Gut-healing protocols where conventional approaches have failed, especially when the arginine-salt oral route is used. Athletes outside WADA jurisdiction running short, scoped cycles with purity-tested product. Versatile healing peptide for users willing to accept gray-market sourcing risk.
Avoid if: Any history of cancer or pre-malignant lesions (VEGFR2 angiogenesis concern). Active proliferative retinopathy. Pregnancy, planning pregnancy, or breastfeeding. On therapeutic anticoagulation. Competing under WADA. Sourcing from unverified vendors without third-party purity testing.
Use Case Breakdown
The overall BioHarmony score reflects the intervention's primary evidence profile. These subratings are independent assessments per use case.
| Use Case | Score | Summary |
|---|---|---|
| โ Injury Recovery | 9.0 | Accelerates tendon, ligament, and muscle healing in animal models; widespread clinical anecdote |
| โ Gut Health / Microbiome | 9.0 | Cytoprotective across entire GI tract; heals ulcers, IBD, and leaky gut in rodent models |
| โ Recovery / Repair | 8.5 | Systemic tissue repair via angiogenesis, growth factor modulation, and nitric oxide pathways |
| โ Wound Healing | 8.5 | Accelerates wound closure and granulation tissue formation across multiple tissue types |
| ๐ช Neuroprotection | 7.5 | Protects neurons from excitotoxicity and oxidative damage; dopaminergic system protection |
| ๐ช Nerve Regeneration | 7.5 | Promotes peripheral nerve repair and axonal sprouting in crush injury models |
| ๐ช Anti-Inflammatory | 7.0 | Modulates NF-kB pathway; reduces TNF-alpha and IL-6 in multiple inflammation models |
| ๐ช Traumatic Brain Injury | 7.0 | Neuroprotective in TBI models; reduces edema and promotes functional recovery |
| ๐ Cardiovascular | 6.5 | Promotes angiogenesis; protects against endothelial dysfunction and arrhythmias |
| ๐ Liver / Detoxification | 6.5 | Hepatoprotective against alcohol, NSAIDs, and toxin-induced liver damage |
| ๐ Acute Pain Relief | 6.5 | Analgesic effect via tissue repair acceleration and inflammation reduction |
| โ๏ธ Bone / Joint Health | 5.5 | Promotes bone healing and protects cartilage in animal models |
| โ๏ธ Chronic Pain Management | 5.5 | Addresses underlying tissue damage rather than masking pain |
| โ Muscle Growth / Hypertrophy | 4.5 | Accelerates muscle fiber repair; indirect support for training recovery |
| โ Flexibility / Mobility | 4.0 | Tendon and ligament repair may restore range of motion |
| โ Mood / Emotional Regulation | 4.0 | Dopaminergic and serotonergic system interactions in animal models |
| โ Skin / Beauty | 4.0 | Wound healing and collagen synthesis support skin repair |
| โ Healthspan | 4.0 | Broad tissue-protective effects support healthy aging |
| โ Geriatric / Aging Population | 4.0 | Healing acceleration particularly valuable in aging populations |
| โ Depression | 3.5 | Modulates dopamine and serotonin systems; limited direct evidence |
| โ Anxiety | 3.5 | GABAergic and serotonergic modulation; anxiolytic in some animal models |
| โ Energy / Fatigue | 3.5 | Indirect via reduced inflammation and improved tissue function |
| โ Immune Function | 3.5 | Immunomodulatory; balances immune response rather than stimulating |
| โ Cognition / Focus | 3.5 | Neuroprotective effects may support cognitive function indirectly |
| โ Longevity / Lifespan | 3.5 | Tissue repair and cytoprotection; no lifespan studies |
| โ Hormonal / Endocrine | 3.0 | Limited evidence; some interaction with growth hormone pathways |
| โ Memory | 3.0 | Dopaminergic protection may preserve memory circuits |
| โ Stress / Resilience | 3.0 | Tissue-level stress protection; limited systemic stress data |
| โ Antioxidant / Oxidative Stress | 3.0 | Reduces oxidative stress markers in tissue injury models |
| โ Strength / Power | 3.0 | Supports training via faster recovery from musculoskeletal injury |
| โ Neuroplasticity | 3.0 | Nerve growth factor interactions; limited direct evidence |
Frequently Asked Questions
How does BPC-157 actually work at the cellular level?
BPC-157 drives repair through three main pathways per Seiwerth 2021 and Hsieh 2017: eNOS-mediated nitric oxide signaling that restores blood flow to damaged tissue, VEGFR2 activation that accelerates angiogenesis and granulation, and growth-hormone receptor upregulation in tendon fibroblasts (Chang 2014). It also modulates dopamine, serotonin, and prostaglandin systems, which explains the neuroprotective and NSAID-counteracting effects seen in rodent gastric-lesion and TBI models.
What is the difference between BPC-157 arginine salt and acetate salt?
The salt form determines route. Arginine salt is orally bioavailable and survives gastric transit well enough for meaningful systemic and GI-local effects at 250 to 500 mcg daily; it is the correct choice for capsules and for gut protocols. Acetate salt is essentially not orally bioavailable and is intended for subcutaneous or intramuscular injection only. Most gray-market vendors sell acetate by default, so verify the salt form before buying an oral product.
How do you dose BPC-157 for injury versus gut healing?
Acute soft-tissue injury typically uses 250 to 500 mcg subcutaneous one to two times per day near the injury site for 4 to 8 weeks. Gut or IBD protocols use 250 to 500 mcg oral arginine-salt capsule twice per day for 4 to 12 weeks so the peptide contacts GI mucosa directly. Maintenance cycles use 200 to 250 mcg SC once daily, often 4 weeks on 2 off to prevent theoretical tolerance.
What is the evidence for BPC-157 in tendon and soft-tissue repair?
The Gwyer 2019 review synthesized ~20 rodent tendon and ligament studies showing accelerated biomechanical recovery after Achilles transection, medial collateral ligament transection, and myotendinous-junction injury. Chang 2014 documented GH-receptor upregulation in injured tendon. The Sikiric 2018 review covers 150+ rodent papers across wound, GI, and CNS models. Human efficacy RCTs do not yet exist, but the cross-lab cross-endpoint animal consistency is unusually strong for a research peptide.
What is the evidence for BPC-157 in GI and IBD conditions?
BPC-157 was discovered as the active cytoprotective fragment of gastric juice, so GI is its home turf. Rodent models per Sikiric 2013 show 40 to 80% reduction in gastric and duodenal ulcer area, improved colitis scores, and protection against NSAID-induced lesions. A small human interstitial cystitis pilot (n=12, 2024) showed symptom reduction. No controlled human IBD trial has published, so oral arginine-salt dosing for gut protocols remains evidence-supported by mechanism and anecdote, not RCT.
Is BPC-157 safe if there are no large human trials?
No catastrophic intrinsic harms have surfaced across 15+ years of widespread gray-market use (N in the tens of thousands). Reported side effects cluster in mild injection-site reactions and occasional transient palpitations or anxiety that resolve on discontinuation. The real risk signal is theoretical: VEGFR2-mediated angiogenesis is a plausible tumor-growth concern in cancer or pre-malignant populations, and proliferative retinopathy is a contraindication for the same reason. Long-term safety data is absent rather than negative.
What is the regulatory and legal status of BPC-157?
BPC-157 is not FDA approved for any therapeutic use. In Sept 2023 the FDA placed it in Category 2 of the 503A compounding bulks list, meaning pharmacies may not legally compound it because of unresolved safety questions. WADA added BPC-157 to the S0 (non-approved substances) prohibited list effective 2022-01-01, covering in- and out-of-competition use. Product sold in the US is therefore research-chemical or gray-market, and users bear full regulatory and purity risk.
Can you stack BPC-157 with TB-500 for recovery?
The BPC-157 plus TB-500 stack is the most popular soft-tissue combination in gray-market peptide practice. Mechanisms are complementary: BPC-157 drives angiogenesis and nitric oxide signaling, while TB-500 (thymosin beta-4 fragment) promotes cell migration and actin reorganization. Common protocols run 250 to 500 mcg BPC-157 SC daily alongside 2 to 2.5 mg TB-500 SC twice weekly for 4 to 6 weeks. No RCT compares stack versus monotherapy, so the synergy claim rests on mechanism plus anecdote.
How This Score Could Change
BioHarmony scores are living assessments. New research, regulatory changes, or personal context can shift the score up or down. These are the most likely scenarios that would change this intervention's rating.
| Scenario | Dimension changes | New score |
|---|---|---|
| First well-powered Phase 2 RCT confirms effect sizes | Efficacy 4.3 to 4.5, Evidence 3.0 to 4.0 | 7.8 / 10 Strong recommend |
| Long-term cancer incidence signal in chronic users | Safety 2.0 to 4.0 | 5.7 / 10 Neutral |
| FDA removes from Category 2 compounding list | Evidence 3.0 to 3.5 | 7.5 / 10 Strong recommend |
| Gray-market contamination scandal with confirmed harms | Safety 2.0 to 3.5 | 6.2 / 10 Worth trying |
| Head-to-head RCT fails to beat placebo for tendon healing | Efficacy 4.3 to 3.0, Evidence 3.0 to 3.5 | 6.3 / 10 Worth trying |
Key Evidence Sources
- Sikiric P et al. Stable gastric pentadecapeptide BPC 157 review. Curr Pharm Des 2018 โ Landmark 150+ study synthesis across GI, musculoskeletal, CNS models
- Gwyer D et al. BPC 157 and tendon healing review. J Appl Biomed 2019 โ Tendon and ligament repair meta-synthesis
- Chang CH et al. GH receptor upregulation in tendon. Molecules 2014 โ PMID 25415472; Achilles tenocyte pathway
- Vuletic M et al. Systematic review: tendon/ligament/muscle junction. Pharmaceuticals 2026 โ PMID 41754849
- Regeneration or Risk? Narrative review. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2025 โ PMID 40789979
- Hsieh MJ et al. VEGFR2 activation and angiogenesis. J Mol Med 2017 โ PMID 27847966
- Sikiric P et al. NSAID counteraction review. 2013 โ PMID 22950504
- Seiwerth S et al. Wound healing review. Front Pharmacol 2021 โ PMID 34267654
- Japjec M et al. Myotendinous junction. Biomedicines 2021 โ PMID 34829776
- IV safety pilot n=2. 2025 โ PMID 40131143
- Interstitial cystitis pilot n=12. 2024 โ PMID 39325560
- FDA Pharmacy Compounding Advisory Committee materials, Sept 2023 โ Category 2 designation
- WADA Prohibited List S0 (effective 2022-01-01) โ Banned in and out of competition
- ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02637284 (Phase 1, unknown status)
- ClinicalTrials.gov NCT07437547 (Phase 2 hamstring, recruiting)
Other interventions for Injury Recovery
๐ How BioHarmony scoring works
BioHarmony translates a weighted expected-value calculation into a reader-facing 0โ10 score. 5.0 is neutral (benefits and risks balance). Above 5 = benefits outweigh risks; below 5 = risks outweigh benefits.
Harm-type downsides (safety risk, side effects, reversibility, dependency) carry a 1.4× precautionary multiplier. Harm weighs more than benefit. Opportunity-type downsides (financial cost, time/effort, opportunity cost) are subtracted at face value.
Use case subratings are independent assessments of how well the intervention addresses specific health goals. They are not components of the overall score. Each subrating reflects the scorer's judgment based on use-case-specific evidence, safety, and effect sizes.
Every dimension is evaluated on a 1–5 scale, and the baseline (1) is subtracted before weighting. A perfect intervention with zero downsides contributes zero penalty rather than a residual floor, so top-tier scores are actually reachable.
EV = Upside − Downside
EV = 2.725 − 0.955 = 1.770
EV ranges from −5 to +5. Adding 7 shifts to 2–12, dividing by 12 normalizes to 0–1, then ×10 gives the 0–10 score.
Score = ((1.770 + 7) / 12) × 10 = 7.3 / 10

